Custom Layout 3
Home Page | Favorite Links Page | Custom Page | Custom2 Page | Custom3 Page


Attention, loyal Americans. Do you believe in your country? Do you believe what your leaders say? Do you believe in the truth?

The greatest tragedy in American history occurred on September 11, 2001. The nation we love was attacked.
Our leaders told us a tale of what happened.

It was a lie.

We dare you, loyal Americans, to look at this evidence, which reveals - in irrefutable clarity - that the Pentagon was not hit by a jetliner on 9/11.

They say a photograph is worth a thousand words. The photos of the Pentagon on that fateful morning clearly show no evidence of airplane debris, nor hole in the wall big enough to be the imprint of a large airliner. Many windows at the point of impact were not even broken!

The photographs,analyses, diagrams and statements of fact that follow provide the clearest evidence that the actual events of that tragic day do not match what we have been told by the leaders of our country. They reveal a chilling picture of deception and misrepresentation, of lies about what happened.

You may wish to continue to support the leaders of our country, but you may not deny the truth of what you see in these pictures and learn from this shocking evidence.

And when you realize the great difference between what you have been told and what you now comprehend, in sorrow and rage you will conclude that the entire fantastic 9/11 coverup is about to unravel, and obstruction of justice, treason, and mass murder are the words the future will confer on the traitorous leaders who told us all those lies about Arab terrorists.Evil men who stole the election and the White House in the year 2000, and engineered this debauched treachery in order to turn America into a murderous police state.

John Kaminsky


The debate is over, the coverup has lost.  The case being proven, now the American people have to see that it gets to  first the court of public opinion and from there, carried on the shoulders of an outraged people to the  House of Representatives  where impeachment articles may be speedily drawn up and to a grand jury where all of the most obvious accomplices must be arraigned 

Dick Eastman

Comment:There are many "anti-war" websites on the internet. There are many "average" Americans that are against the war in Iraq - or any war anywhere who have protested against the war in various ways. There are many "alternative news" sources reporting daily on the carnage being inflicted on the sons of America and the American Ideal of life. All of these activities aimed at stopping war and correcting the imbalances brought about by the fascist Bush Administration are laudable, but they repeatedly fail to focus on the one thing that could bring about all the changes they desire. If all of those who are seeing the many aspects of falsity of the Bush Administration and the ferocity of the Forces behind it could UNITE and focus the Laser Light of Truth on that one, singular event that exposes and defines the nature of the Powers that have taken over America: the Strike on the Pentagon, the axe could be directed at the root of the tree rather than endlessly wasting time lopping branches that just keep growing back.

The fact is: the alleged strike on the Pentagon by alleged "Arab Terrorists" is the thread that, if pulled hard enough, can unravel the entire fabric of lies. As Laura has written in her Comments on the Pentagon Strike:

This brings us back to the many problems of the Pentagon strike that indicate that it was not a 757, and why would the "experts" continue to insist that it was? After all, even if it WAS a conspiracy, and somebody went to the trouble to arrange for a couple big jets to hit the World Trade Center, why not just use the same procedure and type of craft to strike the Pentagon?

Let's assume that it WAS a smaller plane that hit the Pentagon. Why?

And we come back to the idea that it is extremely likely that a plane that had onboard smart missile guidance system that can literally turn corners and hit the target with such precision that it is amazing was used.

And we consider this carefully and the only answer that presents itself as obvious is that of the necessity for precision.

And that leads us directly to the question of why such precision might be necessary?

The question can only be answered logically by assuming Precision was the major concern in the strike on the pentagon.

And theorizing that precision was a major concern - precision of the type that can hit an exact window on a designated floor and do an exact and designated amount of damage - we realize that LIMITING the damage to a specific and pre-designated area was the major concern.

And if that was the major concern, then we arrive at the idea that such precision and limitation was essential for some reason.

And the only reason that we can come to is that they wanted to hit the Pentagon for the emotional impact. Which leads to the idea that the emotional response of the public to the "poor people in the pentagon" was desirable. But since this emotional impact was achieved with such precision and control suggests to us that it was also an ALIBI. In short, the safety of CERTAIN occupants of the building was a concern. Which leads to the idea that those certain occupants of the building...

We notice that Newsweek coyly mentions that "On Sept. 10, NEWSWEEK has learned, a group of top Pentagon officials suddenly canceled travel plans for the next morning, apparently because of security concerns."

Did you have a look at the list of casualties in the pentagon itself? Where were all the bigwigs in the building???? What about those guys who canceled their travel plans and who were very likely IN THE BUILDING at the time? If what we have theorized is true, it's not likely that they canceled their travel plans because they might get on the wrong jet. I would be very interested to know who those guys were.

IF we are dealing with a conspiracy - as has been suggested by many people - designed to generate the emotional response from the masses of Americans so as to facilitate the imposition of a One World Government - which is what IS happening, by the way - then it is very likely that a number of the conspirators were IN THE PENTAGON AT THE TIME IT WAS HIT.

And yes, in the worlds of intelligence and conspiracy, that kind of logic prevails. Please read Dolan for a broader understanding of the military role in the establishment of the Secret State so that you can be assured that hitting the pentagon would very likely be seen as essential to divert attention AWAY from individuals within our own military organizations as possible conspirators. Once you have a good handle on the disinformation and COINTELPRO machines, you will understand why a strike against the pentagon was important not only for the ALIBI, but for the EMOTIONAL IMPACT on the public. After all, if the buildings that represent not only our status in the world, but also our ability to maintain that status - i.e. our military organization - are hit by terrorists, then the emotional reaction of the people will naturally be that we not only have a right to strike back with all our power, but also that we MUST. They will also not look at the possibility of a "home conspiracy" because - after all - the Pentagon WAS a target, right?!

We suggest that the strike on the Pentagon was designed for maximum emotional impact. And it is obvious that, for this purpose, one would not want to use a 757 because it is not amenable to the precision required for the safety of the conspirators in the building. What was needed was something that could strike the Pentagon with extreme precision both in terms of WHERE it hit, and how.

In The Propaganda Preparation for 9/11 by Chaim Kupferberg we read:

[...] The events of September 11 were planned by those who not only had the motive, means, and opportunity to carry out the plan, but also were best placed to manage the consequences stemming from it, as well as managing the flow of information. [...] The events of September 11 were masterminded by those who were in the best position to manage the consequences. [...]

Conspiracies, involve rational, albeit cold-blooded, attempts to achieve a desired end by employing the most effective means available. [...] Motive, means, and opportunity. [...]

It appears that the events of September 11 were planned years in advance, with the groundwork being carefully laid by a propaganda campaign orchestrated to convince the public that the United States has a plausibly sophisticated nemesis with the motive, means, and opportunity to perpetrate a devastating act of terror against Americans. [...]

In all cases, the actions of proxy agents and operative planners are sufficiently distanced and compartmentalized from the true masterminds to create a condition of "plausible deniability". In short, the proxies have also been set up as possible patsies with evidence that has been carefully laid to incriminate them should cracks in the "official story" become too discernible. [...]

The real guilt must inevitably lie with those in the best position to manage the flow of information as well as reliably benefit from the new order created, primarily, the political and corporate elites of the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Union - also, as it happens, the very parties orchestrating the global war on terrorism....

If this notion of reality strikes you as somewhat dissonant, at odds with your own personal experience, it may be perhaps that [...] you have not read the mountain of evidence detailing political and elite deviant behaviour in this country. ...

We also still have the problem of what really happened to Flight 77 and its passengers?

If there were passengers on the Boeing that did not hit the Pentagon - as we are assured is the case by the evidence - it's clear that they could not be allowed to live to tell the tale. That means we must take another look at the group of individuals - the current administration and the forces behind it who are so obviously lying to us about a Boeing hitting the Pentagon when it clearly was NOT a Boeing. We must now look at them as cold blooded murderers.

Think about that for just a moment. Think about the implications of the idea that there are men in control of the United States of America who have obviously murdered a group of innocent passengers on an airplane simply to bolster the lie of an attack that never happened as it was described; that could NOT have happened as it was presented to the public as is clearly shown by the evidence.

Think about it!

Cold blooded murderers are in control of the United States of America.

Now, have a look at this story: 911 Widow's Bush Treason Suit Vanishes which says, in part:

Grieving New Hampshire widow who lost her man on 9/11 refuses the government's million dollar hush money payoff, studies the facts of the day for nearly two years, and comes to believe the White House "intentionally allowed 9/11 to happen" to launch a so-called "War on Terrorism" for personal and political gain.

She retains a prominent lawyer, a former Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania,who served with distinction under both Democrats and Republicans and was once a strong candidate for the governor's seat.

The attorney files a 62-page complaint in federal district court (including 40 pages of prima facie evidence) charging that "President Bush and officials including, but not limited to Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Ashcroft and Tenet":

1.) had adequate foreknowledge of 911 yet failed to warn the county or attempt to prevent it;
2.) have since been covering up the truth of that day;
3.) have therefore abetted the murder of plaintiff's husband and violated the Constitution and multiple laws of the United States; and
4.) are thus being sued under the Civil RICO (Racketeering, Influence, and Corrupt Organization) Act for malfeasant conspiracy, obstruction of justice and wrongful death.

The suit text goes on to document the detailed forewarnings from foreign governments and FBI agents; the unprecedented delinquency of our air defense; the inexplicable half hour dawdle of our Commander in Chief at a primary school after hearing the nation was under deadly attack; the incessant invocation of national security and executive privilege to suppress the facts; and the obstruction of all subsequent efforts to investigate the disaster. It concludes that "compelling evidence will be presented in this case through discovery, subpoena power, and testimony [that] Defendants failed to act and prevent 9/11 knowing the attacks would lead to an 'International War on Terror' which would benefit Defendants both financially and politically."

Press releases detailing these explosive allegations are sent out to 3000 journalists in the print and broadcast media, and a press conference to announce the filing is held in front of Independence Hall in Philadelphia on November 26th (commemorating the end of the first futile year of the independent National 9/11 Commission).

Imagine the world-churning implications of these charges. Imagine the furor if just one was proved true. Imagine the courage of this bribe-shunning widow and an eminent attorney with his rep on the line. Then imagine a press conference to which nobody came. [...]

When you present documented charges of official treachery behind the greatest national security disaster in modern history and the press doesn't show, doesn't listen, doesn't write - just what in fact is really being communicated? That despite all the deaths, lies, wars, and bizarre official actions that flowed from 9/11 there's actually nothing there to be investigated at all? That addressing desperate victim families' still unanswered cries for truth is not a legitimate journalistic concern? That news will now be what the corporate media say it will be, so drink your infotainment Kool-Aid and kindly shut up? [...]

There is a clear method and message in this obscurantist madness. All this media consolidation and tightening control is strategically aligned with deregulation, privatization, social program-gutting deficits and free trade regimes. They are all convergent tactics to enforce corporations' full spectrum dominance over democratic humankind. If your progressive or conservative instincts bid you to arise against this coup, standing with our 9/11 widow is a good place to start. Her name is Ellen Mariani, her lawyer is Phillip Berg and their complaint is now online at

The only problem is: when you click the link, you find that the documents charging the Bush Administration with treason have disappeared.

Jared Israel wrote on September 15, 2001:

We are not soothsayers.

We cannot say with certainty what happened September 11 - that is, what really happened, behind the scenes. But [a] report from the semi-official 'N.Y. Times' makes it clear that either Americans are being lied to by the those in the highest places - which if true has the gravest implications - or else the rulers of Washington's New World Order are criminally negligent.

In analyzing the 9-11 nightmare, we were puzzled by the official response to the so-called third plane. That is the one that left Dulles Airport,flew to Ohio, near the West Virginia and Kentucky borders, turned around, flew back to Washington and struck the Pentagon.

Concerning this plane, we asked: how could it stay in the air, hijacked, for almost an hour after two other hijacked planes had struck the WTC Towers, and not be seen by U.S. air defense forces? How could it fly to the Midwest,turn around and fly back to Washington and hit the Pentagon without being spotted and therefore intercepted? [...]

If it was difficult to believe that the third plane was not spotted, then it is a good deal harder to believe that it was spotted and tracked for over half an hour and yet nothing was done because officials "didn't know what to do." Why didn't they force the plane down and failing that, shoot it down? Before you think, "Because, as the article says, they didn't have a procedure for handling such an occurrence," note the following comment from deputy defense secretary Wolfowitz. Talking about the fourth plane, the one that crashed in Pennsylvania:

"Paul Wolfowitz, the deputy defense secretary, said today that the Pentagon had been tracking that plane and could have shot it down if necessary; it crashed about 35 minutes after the Pentagon crash." ('N.Y. Times, Sept. 15, 2001)

"Could have shot it down if necessary." If they "could have shot" down the fourth plane, why did they not shoot down the third?

Once they knew these were suicide hijackings - and surely they knew that by around 9:00 am - why would they wait? [...]

What we have here is either criminal negligence beyond belief, and that includes the Commander in Chief, who hearing that planes are destroying the country focuses on goats, or b) the 'N.Y. Times' piece is repeating a cover story whose purpose is to explain away the obvious flaw in the original story: namely, that a plan could be hijacked in Ohio, and fly all the way back to Washington without being spotted.

And if the 'N.Y. Times' story is a lie, then those who fed the 'Times' this lie are guilty of conspiracy. They are people in high places and they are directly involved in the murder of God knows how many people in N.Y. as well as the 800 casualties the media speaks of in Washington either because they planned these attacks, perhaps working through Islamist groups secretly controlled by the CIA or they knew the attacks were going to happen and wanted to let them happen. The obvious motive: to create a seeming justification for extreme military action. And that is why they did not allow the Air Force to stop possibly the second and certainly the third planes.

So there you have it - either criminal negligence, including Mr. Bush who reads about goats while his countrymen are slaughtered, or treason.

Given these amazing facts, available in the mainstream media, why is there no call for an investigation? Mr. Bush has called for bringing those responsible to justice. Let us begin at home.

In an article published by the Daily Telegraph we read:

A former cabinet minister is drawing huge crowds and stoking the fires of anti-Americanism in Germany with a book arguing that the US government mounted the Sept 11 attacks as part of a plot to win global domination.

Andreas von Bulow has gone further than Michael Meacher, Tony Blair's former environment minister, who was widely criticised for claiming that America knowingly failed to prevent the attacks.

Mr von Bulow, 66, a former research minister in the German government, believes that September 11, when more than 3,000 people died, was staged to justify the subsequent wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. [...]

Polls show that a fifth of the [German] population, and one in three of those under 30, believe the US government ordered the attacks.

"If what I say is right, the whole US government should end up behind bars," Mr von Bulow told The Daily Telegraph at his home in Bonn.

"They have hidden behind a veil of secrecy and destroyed the evidence -that they invented the story of 19 Muslims working within Osama bin Laden's al-Qa'eda - in order to hide the truth of their own covert operation.

"What I saw on September 11 was a perfectly executed act that could have happened only with the support of intelligence services, and whoever controlled it must have known could only bring harm to the Muslim world," he said.

"I'm convinced that the US apparatus must have played a role and my theory is backed up by the [Washington] government's refusal to present any proof whatsoever of what happened." [...]

Some say the highly lucid politician has become a paranoid publicity-seeker. But he is not alone in his hypotheses. At least two other September 11 conspiracy theory books are on the bestseller lists in Germany. [...]

"I'm not in the least anti-American," he insisted. "I'm just part of a growing momentum against Bush and his chess power-politics. I feel sorry for those who are being sucked in by his ideas.

The telegraph published a related article on 07/09/2003:

Michael Meacher, one of Tony Blair's longest serving ministers until earlier this year, sparked outrage yesterday by suggesting that the United States government deliberately allowed the terrorist attacks of September 11 to take place. Mr Meacher said the attacks, in which at least 3,000 people died, provided a convenient pretext for wars on Afghanistan and Iraq in which the real purpose was to secure oil supplies for America.

Michael Meacher The former environment minister, who until three months ago shared responsibility for Britain's nuclear power plants, made the extraordinary claims in a newspaper article.

Mr Meacher listed a number of reports detailing intelligence that the US was said to have which warned of the September 11 attacks. He questioned why military jets were not sent to intercept the hijacked passenger aircraft on the morning of the outrage two years ago.

"Was this inaction simply the result of key people disregarding, or being ignorant of, the evidence? Or could US air security operations have been deliberately stood down on September 11? If so, why and on whose authority?" Mr Meacher wrote in The Guardian yesterday.

The MP for Oldham cited a document called Rebuilding America's Defences, written in September 2000 by a neo-conservative think tank, Project for the New American Century, which was set up by a group that included Dick Cheney, the American vice president, Donald Rumsfeld, the defence secretary, and Paul Wolfowitz, the deputy defence secretary, which he called "a blueprint for US world domination". He said the document stated that making America "tomorrow's dominant force" would be a long process without "some catalysing event - like a new Pearl Harbour".

The former minister's suggestion that there might have been a deliberate attempt to allow the September 11 attacks provoked a strong reaction from the US embassy in London. "Mr Meacher's fantastic allegations - especially his assertion that the US government knowingly stood by while terrorists killed some 3,000 innocents in New York, Pennsylvania and Virginia - would be monstrous, and monstrously offensive, if they came from someone serious or credible," said an embassy spokesman.

Senior Conservatives also heaped condemnation on the former minister. "We appear to be witnessing the rebirth of what used to be called the 'loony Left'," said Bernard Jenkin, the shadow defence secretary.[...]

Regarding the reaction from the US Embassy in London, we are reminded of one of the chief characteristics of the Psychopath:

As [Dr. Robert] Hare states, "Lying, deceiving, and manipulation are natural talents for psychopaths...

When caught in a lie or challenged with the truth, they are seldom perplexed or embarrassed -- they simply change their stories or attempt to rework the facts so that they appear to be consistent with the lie.

The results are a series of contradictory statements and a thoroughly confused listener." [Hare, 46].

Often,their behaviour serves to confuse and repress their victims, or to influence anyone who might listen to the psychopath's side of the story. Manipulation is the key to their conquests, and lying is one way they achieve this.

One almost amusing example of how psychopaths lie can be exemplified by a man who's footprint was discovered at the scene of the crime.

"No, that's not my foot" he said, even though everyone knew he was lying.

This is how psychopaths operate. They will deny reality until their victims have a nervous breakdown.

Often,the psychopath will turn on the victim and claim that the victim suffers from "delusions" and is not mentally stable.

These tactics are exactly what we see in the Bush Administration's handling of the many clues about the truth of 9-11.

Again:If all of those who are seeing the many aspects of falsity of the Bush Administration and the ferocity of the Forces behind it could UNITE and focus the Laser Light of Truth on that one, singular event that exposes and defines the nature of the Powers that have taken over America:the Strike on the Pentagon, the axe could be directed at the root of the tree rather than endlessly wasting time lopping off branches that just keep growing back.